Scope
Start with software, documents, spreadsheets and examples of real work. Use conversations to fill the important gaps.
Consider changing the process, configuring a platform, integrating systems or building something custom.
Explain the trade-offs, dependencies and next scope in terms the business and technical team can judge.
If you are taking over a product or weighing a rewrite, we can review the code, architecture and release process against the changes you need to make. Depending on the agreed scope, that can include integrations, permissions, performance, test coverage and deployment.
The useful output is a set of findings with examples, priorities and an explanation of the effect on the product. We separate a focused fix from work that needs deeper investigation. Our MERP/PREP modernization began with understanding the existing applications before rebuilding them.
When the main unknown is what the product should do, product discovery is the better starting point.
ECONT needed a document platform, but its existing sign-on and ERP permissions still had a job to do. We built the DMS around those systems. The useful decision was where the new software should fit.
A consulting engagement should give you that kind of answer: what to change, what to keep and what to investigate before committing to a build. Read the ECONT case.
No. Send the material you have: a plan, a few examples, access to the current application or a description of the decision you face. We review it before deciding which conversations and checks are needed.
The options considered, the reason for the proposed approach, its dependencies and the questions still open. We agree the depth of the review and its outputs before starting.
Tell us what you are weighing up and what is making the choice difficult. We can agree a review around that decision.